Ron Paul Not Last Night's Biggest Loser
You know what? Last night, there wasn't only a Democratic primary in Pennsylvania. Sure, the liberal communist Muslim terrorists would like you to believe that, but, oh no. There was a Republican primary, too.
Well, to be fair, it wasn't much of a primary. I mean, the Republicans have already chosen John McCain as their candidate. But that doesn't mean that Democracy should be ignored. Just because it's mathematically impossible for a candidate to win doesn't mean that he can't win.
Stop using logic. And start thinking like Ron Paul…
…Texas Rep. Ron Paul's revolutionaries continue to plug away. With 45% of Pennsylvania's 9,268 precincts reporting, Paul has captured 15% of the vote. He's easily beating former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who has only 12%.
You see that? Ron Paul — who is still officially a candidiate — might be a loser, but he's beating that other loser — the fat Jesus guy, the one who admitted he lost and dropped out — by three whole percentage points.
The Ron Paul Revolution is still going just as strong as it ever was!
RSS
Yes, democracy should not be ignored. Perhaps you might want to pass that sentiment on to party officials who have told those wishing to vote for Ron Paul that they MUST vote for McCain — just like in those commie countries that you alluded to….
I think the best satire about this is that it was acutally classified as "news"
And to think he got 16% of the vote in PA with NO help from the
media, or the GOP.
That is amazing. All from the grassroots.
I think more people should find out about Ron Paul .
They would learn some things.
http://ronpaul2008.com
or the news that over 1 in 4 Republicans are still refusing to vote for McCain.
Maybe instead of bashing Ron Paul you should do some research on all the candidates in the running. Make an educated, informed vote, instead of an ignorant one. Maybe everyone should take full advantage of the freedoms we have today, because of our fore fathers. You know, the men that wrote the Constitution. You know, that thing Ron Paul wants us to get back to! oh–maybe you didnt know! Our country has gotten WAY off course because people don't research the candidates and really look into their past voting records and see what they have done while being senators or congressman. People are LAZY and they just want to rely on the media, the candidates, or just anyone else to tell them what/who these people are! Get a clue!
Whatever Chubby, your an ignorant douchbag….. The revolution continues……
Ron Paul is the only candidate that talks out against the SPP (security prosperity and partnership of North America) that Bush, the Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper, and Mexico's Pres Calderon are working on with 30 top corporations to merge our three countries. McCain, Obama or Clinton will continue the process. They don't even mention this even as highways & corridors (NASCO) are being built, currency of the Amero is designed (former Pres of Mexico Vincente Fox spoke to Larry King) and the 4th meeting is held behind doors in New Orleans last week. Pres Bush makes no mention of the loss of sovereignty we are being dealt since it is being done "without congressional approval and is therefore illegal." (The Late Great U.S.A. by Dr Jerome Corsi) After we have been hurt so hard in our pocketbooks will the country agree to such a merger. The founding fathers would be proud of Dr Ron Paul for standing up to what is left of this experiment of freedom the past 233 years. We ignorantly vote for those who are eroding these freedoms. No one will be laughing then.
It's a shame that some Americans can't see why Ron Paul isn't good for the country as a president. He would be for the Constitution, all right. But when you get to regulating big corporations, he's against that. He's against enforcing regulations on the Fed, banks, and investment firms. He's for free-market, which means that we all suffer or prosper by letting the market have unfettered free flow, whether up or down, for however long each cycle lasts.
These changes are supposed to be what the Founders wanted when the Constitution was drafted. But the reality of the consequences of a truly Libertarian economy were incarnated in the western part of the US in the 19th century. Most of it wasn't even incorporated into territories yet, and so Constitutional law and federal regulations had no place. THAT kind of atmosphere was a free-for-all for corporate America back east, and gave rise to monopolies, unregulated business practices which led to getting illegal immigrants for cheap labor! Something else that Dr. Paul omits when he says he's a liberal Republican.
This is what Ron Paul, an otherwise good man, would bring us if he were president.
DR RON PAUL IS THE ONLY ONE THAT IS FOR OUR COUNTRY. THE OTHERS ARE FOR A NORTH AMERICAN UNION. HE IS WHAT IS LEFT OF A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN. BRING THOSE REPUBLICANS BACK. MCCAIN IS A LIBERAL .
Ron Paul is the only candidate that supports the constitution and we are not turning our support from him and freedom. Its time we get someone like Ron Paul elected as the president of the united states.