Good news, everybody. You can stop struggling to make sense of the idiotic racist murder that James von Brunn carried out at the Holocaust Museum this afternoon.

Belief.net's David Klinghoffer has figured out the real culprit here. It was Charles Darwin…

He writes in his manifesto… "As with ALL LIBERAL ideologies, miscegenation is totally inconsistent with Natural Law: the species are improved through in-breeding, natural selection and mutation. Only the strong survive. Cross-breeding Whites with species lower on the evolutionary scale diminishes the White gene-pool while increasing the number of physiologically, psychologically and behaviorally deprived mongrels."…

This wacko hates Christianity as much he does Judaism. And like Hitler in Mein Kampf, he draws lessons from his interpretation of Darwinism. He's very big on dangers to the Aryan "gene pool." The subtitle of his book promies: "A New Hard-Hitting Exposé Of The JEW CONSPIRACY To Destroy The White Gene-Pool."…

No, he doesn't cite Darwin by name in the part of his book that's readable online — the first 6 of 12 chapters. But do you get the general drift? And you want to tell me that ideas don't have consequences?

Wow. Somebody hurry up and invent an Einstein Award for Excellence in the Field of Thinking, because this Klinghoffer guy totally deserves it.

He has clearly proven that if a person "draws lessons" (otherwise known as completely misrepresenting an idea so as to create a bullshit justification for a flawed and hateful belief system) from a thing, that thing becomes completely responsible the person's actions.

It's amazing that this masterful theory of Klinghoffer's has never ever ever been trotted out by people who don't believe in evolution before. Because there's no possible way that anybody could make a cogent argument against this theory.

And, besides, choosing the groups of people that you think deserve to be murdered and non-personal natural selection occurring over the course of several million years are the exact same thing. Am I right?