<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>



<channel>
	<title>Indecision Forever &#187; Dan Quayle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/tag/dan-quayle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com</link>
	<description>Indecision Forever blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>So, The Daily Show Ruined White House Transparency for All of Us</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/06/26/so-the-daily-show-ruined-white-house-transparency-for-all-of-us/?xrs=</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/06/26/so-the-daily-show-ruined-white-house-transparency-for-all-of-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Quayle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiro Agnew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indecisionforever.com/?p=13857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turns out that from now on, according to the current Department of Justice,  we can expect our vice presidents to refuse to conduct public interviews, because there&#039;s a chance that if (when) they say something stupid (really stupid) then they&#039;ll get made fun of on The Daily Show.
.

					
					$(document).ready(function(){
						MTVNPlayerPreload.attachToWrappers("embedWrapper",300,400);
					});
					
					
					
					
.
Thanks a lot, Jon Stewart! This is why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out that from now on, according to the current Department of Justice,  we can expect our vice presidents to refuse to conduct public interviews, because there&#039;s a chance that if (when) they say something stupid (really stupid) then they&#039;ll get made fun of on The Daily Show.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.comedycentral.com/comedycentral/media_player/mtvn_player_preload.js"></script>
					<script>
					$(document).ready(function(){
						MTVNPlayerPreload.attachToWrappers("embedWrapper",300,400);
					});
					</script>
					<div id="mgid:cms:video:comedycentral.com:231571" class="embedWrapper" style="position: relative;cursor:pointer;width:400px;" flashVars="autoPlay=true">
					<img src="http://www.comedycentral.com/images/shows/tds/videos/season_14/14087/ds_14087_02_v6.jpg" width="400px" height="300px" class="placeholderImg"/>
					</div><br><br></p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span><br />
Thanks a lot, Jon Stewart! This is why we can&#039;t keep nice ideals in this country.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=13857&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/06/26/so-the-daily-show-ruined-white-house-transparency-for-all-of-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Sarah Palin Lost the Election&#8230; and Saved America</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/22/how-sarah-palin-lost-the-election-and-saved-america/?xrs=</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/22/how-sarah-palin-lost-the-election-and-saved-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Quayle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indecision2008.com/?p=6664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sure was smart of John McCain to choose a woman he met in an elevator or something as his running mate for the most important task of his political career.
Yep. She sure is working out like gangbusters with the electorate&#8230;
Palin&#039;s qualifications to be president now rank as voters&#039; top concern about John McCain&#039;s candidacy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6665" src="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/files/2008/10/sarahpalin11.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="257" align="right" />It sure was smart of John McCain to choose a woman he met in an elevator or something as his running mate for the most important task of his political career.</p>
<p>Yep. She sure is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/21/the-palin-effect-from-bad_n_136711.html" target="_blank">working out like gangbusters</a> with the electorate&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Palin&#039;s qualifications to be president now rank as</strong> <strong>voters&#039; top concern about John McCain&#039;s candidacy</strong> &#8211; &#034;ahead of continuing President Bush&#039;s policies, enacting economic policies that only benefit the rich and keeping too high of a troop presence in Iraq,&#034; according to a new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh? I didn&#039;t see that coming when I pasted that pull quote into this post before reading it. She&#039;s the main reason voters have for not voting for McCain? But that can&#039;t be! She&#039;s all folksy and hockey-mommish. I thought that America was mesmerized by her Tina Fey-esque small town charms.</p>
<p>Could it be that the shine is coming off the puck?</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Fifty-five percent of respondents now say Palin is not qualified to serve as president</strong>, a five-point jump from the previous NBC/WSJ survey.</p></blockquote>
<p>To be fair, those are numbers, and numbers are kinda related to science, I think. So, they&#039;re really not to be trusted.</p>
<p>You see, there&#039;s a whole &#039;nuther way of looking at this. She&#039;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/21/us/politics/21poll.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" target="_blank">setting campaign records</a> that are just as important and difficult as Barack Obama&#039;s&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. <strong>Obama&#039;s favorability is the highest for a presidential candidate running for a first term in the last 28 years</strong> of Times/CBS polls.</p>
<p>Mrs. <strong>Palin&#039;s negative rating is the highest for a vice-presidential candidate</strong> as measured by The Times and CBS News. Even Dan Quayle, with whom Mrs. Palin is often compared because of her age and inexperience on the national scene, was not viewed as negatively in the 1988 campaign.</p></blockquote>
<p>That might be true, but I don&#039;t think you can really compare <a href="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/02/most-underrated-vice-presidents-dan-quayle/" target="_blank">Dan Quayle</a> to Sarah Palin. For one thing, he wasn&#039;t a maverick. Nor a hockey mom. Also, he was neither a pitbull nor a tube of lipstick. Nor, as a candidate, did he ever state his intentions to reign supreme as the <a href="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/21/sarah-palin-will-rule-the-senate-with-an-iron-fist/" target="_blank">God Head of the Senate</a>.</p>
<p>So, it&#039;s not really fair to compare their negativity ratings. I mean, there&#039;s a big difference between a incompetent vice-president and caricature of a incompetent vice president.</p>
<p>You see, she&#039;s not all about &#034;inspiring confidence&#034; or &#034;doin&#039; stuff good&#034; or &#034;not constantly making embarrassing mistakes on television.&#034;</p>
<p>She&#039;s about&#8230; Well, I don&#039;t know. Something else. Something that doesn&#039;t involve numbers or reality or stuff.</p>
<p><strong>Update: </strong>Newsweek weighs in on the <a href="http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/21/in-which-sarah-palin-displays-the-latest-in-donkey-fashion.aspx" target="_blank">donkey scarf mystery</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=6664&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/22/how-sarah-palin-lost-the-election-and-saved-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dan Quayle Rears His Head Over the Airspace of Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/16/dan-quayle-rears-his-head-over-the-airspace-of-sarah-palin/?xrs=</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/16/dan-quayle-rears-his-head-over-the-airspace-of-sarah-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Ris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Quayle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indecision2008.com/?p=6505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#039;s one person that Sarah Palin and John McCain wanted out of the political discourse, it was Dan Quayle.  Any mention of the bumbling, light-weight former vice president was a painful reminder of Palin&#039;s numerous gaffes and shortcomings on the campaign trail.
Well, guess who showed up yesterday?  Dan Quayle!
The former vice president [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6506" src="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/files/2008/10/danquayle1.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="246" align="right" />If there&#039;s one person that Sarah Palin and John McCain wanted out of the political discourse, it was Dan Quayle.  Any mention of the bumbling, light-weight former vice president was a painful reminder of Palin&#039;s numerous gaffes and shortcomings on the campaign trail.</p>
<p>Well, guess who showed up yesterday?  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Quayle-Palin.html" target="new">Dan Quayle</a>!</p>
<blockquote><p>The former vice president said Wednesday that he&#039;s spoken with Palin since Sen. John McCain chose her for the GOP ticket in late August.</p>
<p>&#034;I basically said, &#039;Look, just be yourself. You were selected by John McCain because of who you are and what you have done, and don&#039;t let them take anything away from you. Just go out and be yourself,&#034;&#039; he said.</p>
<p>Quayle said he sees several parallels between the 1988 campaign and this year&#039;s race: Neither he nor the Alaska governor were well known before being put on the national ticket. Both were criticized for not having enough experience for the job.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yikes.  So even Quayle, the national laughingstock himself, is drawing the comparison with Palin.  And they&#039;ve discussed this in person!</p>
<p>Maybe Quayle is injecting his tainted name into the race at this point as revenge against McCain, who clearly stole the name of his 2002 memoir (&#034;<a href=" http://www.amazon.com/Worth-Fighting-John-S-McCain/dp/0375505423 " target="new">Worth the Fighting For</a>&#034;) from Quayle&#039;s 1999 literary masterpiece (&#034;<a href="https://www.alibris.com/search/books/qwork/7316879/used/Worth%20fighting%20for " target="new">Worth Fighting For</a>&#034;).</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=6505&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/16/dan-quayle-rears-his-head-over-the-airspace-of-sarah-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Underrated Vice-Presidents: Dan Quayle</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/02/most-underrated-vice-presidents-dan-quayle/?xrs=</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/02/most-underrated-vice-presidents-dan-quayle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yankee Pot Roast</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Quayle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indecision2008.com/?p=6140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of misunderestimations flying rampantly around tonight&#039;s vice-presidential debate, we asked Geoff Wolinetz, Nick Jezarian and Josh Abraham &#8212; editors of the hilariously funny Yankee Pot Roast and authors of Underrated: The Yankee Pot Roast Book of Awesomely Underappreciated Stuff &#8212; to count down some of the most underrated veeps, which we&#039;ll be featuring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In honor of misunderestimations flying rampantly around tonight&#039;s vice-presidential debate, we asked Geoff Wolinetz, Nick Jezarian and Josh Abraham &#8212; editors of the hilariously funny <a href="http://www.yankeepotroast.org/" target="_blank">Yankee Pot Roast</a> and authors of <a href="http://www.underratedbook.com/" target="_blank">Underrated: The Yankee Pot Roast Book of Awesomely Underappreciated Stuff</a> &#8212; to count down some of the most underrated veeps, which we&#039;ll be featuring as the world spends the next few days trying to make sense of the Palin/Biden debate. </em></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6141" src="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/files/2008/10/danquayle.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="268" align="right" />Poor ol&#039; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Quayle" target="_blank">James Danforth Quayle</a> (44th Vice President, 1989-1993).</p>
<p>Sure, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senator,_you%27re_no_Jack_Kennedy" target="new">he&#039;s no Jack Kennedy</a>, and, frankly, he wasn&#039;t much of a vice-president.</p>
<p>His biggest political fight was <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,975627,00.html" target="_blank">an attack on Murphy Brown</a> &#8212; which he lost. But he is, technically, underrated because he took a whole lot of crap from the media for being a moron, and, upon his exit from the political stage, it looked like his only legacy was that of being the hands-down stupidest person ever to be elected to office.</p>
<p>But&#8230; uh&#8230; in hindsight&#8230; the depths of electable stupidity can be plumbed much, much lower. So what, he misspelled &#034;<a href="http://www.capitalcentury.com/1992.html" target="_blank">potato</a>&#034; and completely bungled-slash-proved the concept of <a href="http://politicalhumor.about.com/cs/quotethis/a/quaylequotes.htm" target="_blank">a mind being a terrible thing to waste</a>. Those are actually kind of insignificant. You cannot misspell your way into war, recession, global warming, and worldwide contempt.</p>
<p>And, hey, even though Quayle thought <a href="http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/526.html" target="_blank">Mars</a> was about as far from the sun as earth, at least he was a moron who <em>believed</em> in science.</p>
<p>And as far as Veeps go, which is worse:  innocent stupidity or willful malfeasance?</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=6140&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/10/02/most-underrated-vice-presidents-dan-quayle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
