<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>



<channel>
	<title>Indecision Forever &#187; Linda Sanchez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/tag/linda-sanchez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com</link>
	<description>Indecision Forever blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rep. Linda Sanchez to Have Baby, Baby Daddy</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/11/21/rep-linda-sanchez-to-have-baby-baby-daddy/?xrs=</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/11/21/rep-linda-sanchez-to-have-baby-baby-daddy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Ris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linda Sanchez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indecision2008.com/?p=7779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California Congresswoman Linda Sanchez is pregnant!  And before you ask &#8212; No, she isn&#039;t married.  You got a problem with that, Ms. Manners?
Sanchez made the announcement yesterday, by granting an exclusive interview to the columnist Patt Morrison&#8230;
According to the column, Sanchez and her boyfriend of a year and half, Jim Sullivan, a public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7782" title="lindasanchez" src="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/files/2008/11/lindasanchez.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="257" align="right" />California Congresswoman Linda Sanchez is pregnant!  And before you ask &#8212; No, she isn&#039;t married.  You got a problem with that, Ms. Manners?</p>
<p>Sanchez <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/11/rep_linda_sanchez_expecting_a.html?hpid=news-col-blogs" target="_blank">made the announcement yesterday</a>, by granting an exclusive interview to the columnist Patt Morrison&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>According to the column, Sanchez and her boyfriend of a year and half, Jim Sullivan, a public relations consultant, are &#034;unofficially engaged.&#034; The baby is due May 21.</p>
<p>&#034;I don&#039;t know how it&#039;ll be received,&#034; Sanchez told the L.A. Times columnist. &#034;I hope people will recognize that to be able to plan that in your life &#8212; I don&#039;t think that marriage and childbirth are black and white. There are certain instances in which you have to do things in reverse order.&#034;</p></blockquote>
<p>The 39-year-old Sanchez will be the first unwed mother ever in Congress.  Needless to say, there have been plenty of congress<em>men</em> who have fathered children out of wedlock.  It&#039;s just easier for them to conceal their scandalous progeny (unless of course they get <a href="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2008/05/12/congressional-confidential-secret-second-family-values/" target="_blank">arrested for drunk driving while going to see them</a>).</p>
<p>As for Sanchez&#039;s so-called &#034;unofficial&#034; fiancee, Jim Sullivan&#8230; He was last seen sneaking onto an outbound freight train with <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/03/levi-johnston-slideshow-m_n_123601.html?page=7" target="_blank">Levi Johnston</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=7779&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/11/21/rep-linda-sanchez-to-have-baby-baby-daddy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Following 5 Democrats and 8 Republicans Called Sarah Palin a Pig and Hate Women in General</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/09/12/the-following-5-democrats-and-8-republicans-called-sarah-palin-a-pig-and-hate-women-in-general/?xrs=</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/09/12/the-following-5-democrats-and-8-republicans-called-sarah-palin-a-pig-and-hate-women-in-general/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Ris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Dreier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard McKeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Bolton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ensign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linda Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Westmoreland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Michaud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Gingrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PigLipstickGate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solomon Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Foxx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indecision2008.com/?p=5555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s bad enough that Barack Obama thinks Sarah Palin is a pig and seeks to &#034;destroy her&#034; and American women in general. But it gets worse: Research shows he was beaten to the punch by 13 of his Congressional colleagues!
Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill, did a little digging into the Congressional Record and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s bad enough that Barack Obama thinks Sarah Palin is a pig and seeks to &#034;<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/10/politics/horserace/entry4436026.shtml" target="new">destroy her</a>&#034; and American women in general. But it gets worse: Research shows he was beaten to the punch by 13 of his Congressional colleagues!</p>
<p>Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill, did a little digging into the Congressional Record and found 16 variations of the &#034;lipstick on a pig&#034; phrase have been uttered by 13 separate members of the 110th Congress. Behold the list of chauvinist, unpatriotic community organizers <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/54_31/hoh/28245-1.html" target="new">currently disgracing our government</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-5555"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>* Rep. Mike Michaud (D-Maine) on the Peru free-trade agreement: &#034;Same old model with a little lipstick.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) on trade policy: &#034;You know the old saying about lipstick on a pig? Well, I smell bacon.&#034;</p>
<p>* Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) on withdrawal in Iraq: &#034;Calling this surrender a &#039;withdrawal&#039; or a &#039;redeployment&#039; is like putting lipstick on a pig. No matter what you call it, it is still a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Lynn &#034;<a href="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/2008/09/05/oh-lawdy-those-uppity-obamas-sure-do-distress-lynn-westmoreland/" target="new">Uppity</a>&#034; Westmoreland (R-Ga.) on energy policy: &#034;The energy bills that were brought out this week was kind of like putting lipstick on a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Westmoreland, again on energy policy: &#034;It&#039;s almost like putting lipstick on a pig. You can make it look good, but it&#039;s only going to be a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Westmoreland, yet again on energy policy: &#034;So while we are passing these bills &#8230; it&#039;s been putting lipstick on a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) on an omnibus spending bill: &#034;There has been lipstick placed on this pig, but it&#039;s still a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.) on an ethics proposal: &#034;They may have put lipstick on that pig, but it is still a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Solomon Ortiz (D-Texas) on the president&#039;s veto of a children&#039;s health bill: &#034;There&#039;s just no lipstick to pretty up this pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Ortiz on language in a border-wall bill: &#034;That puts a little lipstick on the pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) on Republican moves on carbon emissions: &#034;You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Sam Johnson (R-Texas) on a children&#039;s health bill alternative: &#034;We have a saying in Texas, if you put lipstick on a pig, it will still be a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Howard McKeon (R-Calif.) on equal-pay legislation: &#034;This amendment is the equivalent of putting lipstick on a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) on wiretapping legislation: &#034;It&#039;s very difficult to put lipstick on a pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.) on Medicare legislation: &#034;&#8230; trying to put lipstick on this legislative pig.&#034;</p>
<p>* Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) on a college- cost bill: &#034;You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig.&#034;</p></blockquote>
<p>Doesn&#039;t Obama have any ideas of his own? Is he so desperate for fresh sexist comments that he resorts to stealing them from Republican women like Virginia Foxx?</p>
<p>At the very least, he could have broadened the statement to include other members of the animal kingdom, like former UN Ambassador John Bolton, <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/bg1910.cfm" target="new">who stated</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#034;We want a butterfly. We&#039;re not going to put lipstick on a caterpillar and declare it a success.&#034;</p></blockquote>
<p>Now <em>that</em> is an example of a non-sexist statement, and for two obvious reasons. One, here we&#039;re applying lipstick to a caterpillar instead of a pig. Two, Bolton is a Republican.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5555&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2008/09/12/the-following-5-democrats-and-8-republicans-called-sarah-palin-a-pig-and-hate-women-in-general/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
