<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indecision Forever &#187; Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/tag/polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com</link>
	<description>Indecision Forever blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart on Megyn Kelly and Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/03/04/jon-stewart-on-megyn-kelly-and-sarah-palin/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/03/04/jon-stewart-on-megyn-kelly-and-sarah-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Tobey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megyn Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Late Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tonight Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=22861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Fox News, they air actual objective news programming from 9am to 4pm and 6pm to 8pm, but as Jon Stewart pointed out on last night&#039;s Daily Show, that simply doesn&#039;t appear to be the case. Of course there&#039;s a reasonable explanation for this. Those time-slots were taken out of context. Fox does indeed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Fox News, they air actual objective news programming from 9am to 4pm and 6pm to 8pm, but as <a href="http://comedians.jokes.com/jon-stewart/" target="_blank">Jon Stewart</a> pointed out on last night&#039;s <a href="http://thedailyshow.com/" target="_blank">Daily Show</a>, that simply doesn&#039;t appear to be the case. Of course there&#039;s a reasonable explanation for this. Those time-slots were taken out of context. Fox does indeed show pure unbiased fact-based news from 9am to 4pm and 6pm to 8pm. And they do it every other February 29.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.comedycentral.com/comedycentral/media_player/mtvn_player_preload.js"></script>
					<script>
					$(document).ready(function(){
						MTVNPlayerPreload.attachToWrappers("embedWrapper",300,400);
					});
					</script>
					<div id="mgid:cms:video:comedycentral.com:266322" class="embedWrapper" style="position: relative;cursor:pointer;width:400px;" flashVars="autoPlay=true">
					<img src="http://www.comedycentral.com//images/shows/tds/videos/season_15/15031/ds_15031_01_v6.jpg" width="400px" height="300px" class="placeholderImg"/>
					</div><br><br></p>
<p>Below, Jon praises the stand-up comedy debut of Sarah Palin.</p>
<p><a href="http://thedailyshow.com/" target="_blank">The Daily Show</a> airs Monday through Thursday at 11pm / 10c.</p>
<p><span id="more-22861"></span></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.comedycentral.com/comedycentral/media_player/mtvn_player_preload.js"></script>
					<script>
					$(document).ready(function(){
						MTVNPlayerPreload.attachToWrappers("embedWrapper",300,400);
					});
					</script>
					<div id="mgid:cms:video:comedycentral.com:266323" class="embedWrapper" style="position: relative;cursor:pointer;width:400px;" flashVars="autoPlay=true">
					<img src="http://www.comedycentral.com//images/shows/tds/videos/season_15/15031/ds_15031_02_v6.jpg" width="400px" height="300px" class="placeholderImg"/>
					</div><br><br></p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=22861&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/03/04/jon-stewart-on-megyn-kelly-and-sarah-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teabaggers Could Potentially Be the GOP&#039;s Ralph Nader, Except Somewhat Consequential</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/17/teabaggers-could-potentially-be-the-gops-ralph-nader-except-somewhat-effectual/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/17/teabaggers-could-potentially-be-the-gops-ralph-nader-except-somewhat-effectual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A'GOPocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=22264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With the Teabaggers gaining more and more steam are veering farther and farther to the right side of the political spectrum, some people are wondering what this could mean for the Republican Party&#8230;
If the Tea Party put up its own candidates for office in this year&#039;s congressional elections, 16 percent of registered voters say they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18715" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/11/teabaggers.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="151" /><br />
With the Teabaggers gaining more and more steam are veering farther and farther to the right side of the political spectrum, some people are wondering <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/02/17/gop-would-suffer-if-the-tea-party-became-a-real-party-with-candi/" target="_blank">what this could mean for the Republican Party</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>If the Tea Party put up its own candidates for office in this year&#039;s congressional elections, 16 percent of registered voters say they would back them, while 45 percent would stick with the Democrats and 33 percent with the Republicans, according to a CNN/Opinion Resarch poll conducted Feb. 12-15.</p>
<p>The net result would be bad news for the GOP: CNN Polling Director Keating Holland said, &#034;&#034;If the Tea Party runs its own candidates for U.S. House, virtually every vote the Tea Party candidate gets would be siphoned from the GOP candidate, potentially allowing the Democrats to win in districts that they might have otherwise lost.&#034;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I&#039;m sure that if the GOP just took a few minutes to calmly explain the situation to these Tea Party people, they&#039;d come to the conclusion that running against the Republican Party would be bad for both teams.</p>
<p>I mean, they seem like a pretty reasonable lot.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=22264&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/17/teabaggers-could-potentially-be-the-gops-ralph-nader-except-somewhat-effectual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America: Thumbs Up for Gay People, Thumbs Down for Homosexuals</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/12/america-thumbs-up-for-gay-people-thumbs-down-for-homosexuals/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/12/america-thumbs-up-for-gay-people-thumbs-down-for-homosexuals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Phillips-Sandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=22110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fascinating new poll reveals what Americans really think about Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell, the controversial policy that prevents gay people homosexuals not-heterosexual people from serving openly in the military&#8230;
In the poll, 59 percent say they now support allowing &#034;homosexuals&#034; to serve in the U.S. military, including 34 percent who say they strongly favor that. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-22111" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2010/02/dictionary.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="244" align="right" />A fascinating new poll <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/11/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6198284.shtml" target="_self">reveals what Americans really think</a> about Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell, the controversial policy that prevents <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">gay people</span> <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">homosexuals</span> not-heterosexual people from serving openly in the military&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>In the poll, <strong>59 percent say they now support allowing &#034;homosexuals&#034; to serve in the U.S. military</strong>, including 34 percent who say they strongly favor that. Ten percent say they somewhat oppose it and 19 percent say they strongly oppose it.</p>
<p>But the numbers differ when the question is changed to whether Americans support &#034;gay men and lesbians&#034; serving in the military. When the question is asked that way, <strong>70 percent of Americans say they support gay men and lesbians serving in the military</strong>, including 19 percent who say they somewhat favor it. Seven percent somewhat oppose it, and 12 percent strongly oppose it.</p></blockquote>
<p>So the solution seems simple enough. Since gay men and lesbians are more popular than homosexuals these days, why not repeal Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell &#8212; but only for gays and lesbians? While we&#039;re at it, we could pass laws allowing gays and lesbians get married.</p>
<p>Between the marriage equality advocates and the anti-homosexual marriage crowd, we should have more than enough support for that.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=22110&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/12/america-thumbs-up-for-gay-people-thumbs-down-for-homosexuals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teabagger Movement &quot;Fruitless Mix of Racism, Conspiracy Theories&quot; According to Fox News Poll</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/11/teabagger-movement-fruitless-mix-of-racism-conspiracy-theories-according-to-fox-news-poll/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/11/teabagger-movement-fruitless-mix-of-racism-conspiracy-theories-according-to-fox-news-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=22101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox News just recently ran an internet poll.
Unfortunately, they ran their internet poll on the internet&#8230;

Now, to be fair, as Fox points out, &#034;This is not a scientific poll.&#034; Certainly not.
If it were &#034;scientific,&#034; its results would be kind of suspect.
(via Wonkette)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News just recently ran an internet poll.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, they <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/02/09/think-tea-party-movement/" target="_blank">ran their internet poll on the internet</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/02/09/think-tea-party-movement/" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-22100" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2010/02/teabagger-poll.jpg" alt="" width="367" height="455" /></a></p>
<p>Now, to be fair, as Fox points out, &#034;This is not a scientific poll.&#034; Certainly not.</p>
<p>If it were &#034;scientific,&#034; its results would be kind of suspect.</p>
<blockquote><p>(via <a href="http://wonkette.com/413645/fox-news-poll-yes-we-are-insanely-racist-crazy-people" target="_blank">Wonkette</a>)</p></blockquote>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=22101&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/11/teabagger-movement-fruitless-mix-of-racism-conspiracy-theories-according-to-fox-news-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Tonight We Dine&#8230; In Health Care Reformless&#8230; Place or Something!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/05/guess-what-health-care-reform-is-not-coming-to-dinner/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/05/guess-what-health-care-reform-is-not-coming-to-dinner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=21867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, for all the fake graphs out there, this line graph from The New York Times is the first one that ever made me laugh out loud&#8230;

These past couple months really have been the GOP&#039;s Thermopylae, haven&#039;t they?
And, come to think of it, it&#039;s been just as exciting (if only half as homoerotic) to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, for all the fake graphs out there, <a href="http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/poll-americans-doubtful-health-overhaul-will-pass/" target="_blank">this line graph from The New York Times</a> is the first one that ever made me laugh out loud&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/poll-americans-doubtful-health-overhaul-will-pass/" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-21866" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2010/02/chart.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="284" /></a></p>
<p>These past couple months really have been the GOP&#039;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300_%28film%29" target="_blank">Thermopylae</a>, haven&#039;t they?</p>
<p>And, come to think of it, it&#039;s been just as exciting (if only half as homoerotic) to watch.</p>
<blockquote><p>(via <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/02/chart-of-the-day-1.html" target="_blank">Andrew Sullivan</a>)</p></blockquote>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=21867&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/05/guess-what-health-care-reform-is-not-coming-to-dinner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Sure Do Have Opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/02/republicans-sure-do-have-opinions/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/02/republicans-sure-do-have-opinions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=21722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daily Kos/Research 2000 polls a random two-thousand and three self-identified Republicans.
I&#039;m not going to get into any of the stats here and now. Instead, I&#039;ll just quote Matthew Tobey, after having sent me the link&#8230;
Every time you think you get to the craziest one, you scroll to the next and jump out the window again.
I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily Kos/Research 2000 polls <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/1/31/US/437" target="_blank">a random two-thousand and three self-identified Republicans</a>.</p>
<p>I&#039;m not going to get into any of the stats here and now. Instead, I&#039;ll just quote Matthew Tobey, after having sent me the link&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Every time you think you get to the craziest one, you scroll to the next and jump out the window again.</p></blockquote>
<p>I lost count after my twelfth time out the window.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=21722&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/02/02/republicans-sure-do-have-opinions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Try to Use Your Poll Better (Is What She Said)</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/01/25/try-to-use-your-poll-better-is-what-she-said/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/01/25/try-to-use-your-poll-better-is-what-she-said/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=21286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From PhD&#8230;

(via Pharyngula)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1271" target="_blank">PhD</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1271" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-21285" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2010/01/polls2.jpg" alt="" width="298" height="650" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>(via <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/01/jorge_chan_gets_it_right.php" target="_blank">Pharyngula</a>)</p></blockquote>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=21286&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/01/25/try-to-use-your-poll-better-is-what-she-said/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turns Out Democrats and Republicans Pretty Much Disagree About Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/01/25/turns-out-democrats-and-republicans-pretty-much-disagree-about-barack-obama/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/01/25/turns-out-democrats-and-republicans-pretty-much-disagree-about-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=21282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, take a look at this new Gallup poll. According to them, Barack Obama&#039;s first year has been the most polarizing of any president ever in the history of the United States and the universe&#8230;
Over the course of this past year, Obama has averaged a job approval rating of 88 percent among Democrats and just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-10267" src="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/03/barackobama2.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="236" align="right" />Hey, take a look at this new Gallup poll. According to them, Barack Obama&#039;s first year has been <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/25/obama-approval-ratings-de_n_435155.html" target="_blank">the most polarizing of any president ever in the history of the United States and the universe</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Over the course of this past year, Obama has averaged a job approval rating of 88 percent among Democrats and just 23 percent among Republicans, according to the study released on Monday morning.</p>
<p>That year-one 65-point margin is the largest that the public opinion research firm has ever recorded.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#039;s weird. Why, that&#039;s almost like there&#039;s some kind of anti-rationality inducing ideology at work here. Like these two political parties have completely separate facts and cannot even agree on simple basic tenets of reality. Like our political system &#8212; fueled by a constant stream of hateful, divisive, jingoistic rhetoric &#8212; is completely and possibly irreparably broken.</p>
<p>Hmmmm&#8230; How odd&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=21282&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/01/25/turns-out-democrats-and-republicans-pretty-much-disagree-about-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton Beats Sarah Palin in the Latest Popularity Contest (Or Does She?)</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/30/hillary-clinton-beats-sarah-palin-in-the-latest-popularity-contest-or-does-she/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/30/hillary-clinton-beats-sarah-palin-in-the-latest-popularity-contest-or-does-she/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Phillips-Sandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=20518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Who is the &#034;Most Admired Woman&#034; in the entire U.S. of A.? I&#039;ll give you some hints: She&#039;s a controversial political figure. She&#039;s a mom. And as far as I know she&#039;s never fired a gun at anything, except maybe her husband that one time.
Give up? 
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continues her reign as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20523" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/12/hillary-clinton-horiz.jpg" alt="hillary-clinton-horiz" width="425" height="245" /><br />
Who is the &#034;Most Admired Woman&#034; in the entire U.S. of A.? I&#039;ll give you some hints: She&#039;s a controversial political figure. She&#039;s a mom. And as far as I know she&#039;s never fired a gun at anything, except maybe her husband that one time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/124895/Clinton-Edges-Palin-Admired-Woman.aspx" target="_self">Give up? </a></p>
<blockquote><p>Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continues her reign as the Most Admired Woman in the eyes of Americans, but barely edges out former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin this year, 16% to 15%. [...]</p>
<p>Clinton has now been named Most Admired Woman 14 times since 1993, spanning her career as first lady, New York senator, and now secretary of state. The three times she has not finished first during this time, she earned second place (to Laura Bush in 2001 and to Mother Teresa in 1995 and 1996).</p></blockquote>
<p>On the other hand, Sarah Palin has <a href="http://twitter.com/sarahpalinusa" target="_self">44,704 Twitter followers</a> and Hillary Clinton doesn&#039;t know &#034;<a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/06/clinton-i-wouldnt-know-a-twitter-from-a-tweeter-iran-protests-us-meddling.html" target="_self">a Twitter from a tweeter</a>,&#034; so let&#039;s just call this one a draw.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=20518&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/30/hillary-clinton-beats-sarah-palin-in-the-latest-popularity-contest-or-does-she/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ranking the States by Smart Thinkingness</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/30/ranking-the-states-by-smart-thinkingness/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/30/ranking-the-states-by-smart-thinkingness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=20529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pew Forum just recently concluded a national poll of how states rank concerning their citizens&#039; &#034;tolerance of people unlike themselves and respect for critical thinking/reason.&#034;
The top ten list is more than a little shocking&#8230;

Just kidding. That&#039;s a list of states with the highest percentage of citizens who &#034;say religion is very important in their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pew Forum just recently concluded a national poll of how states rank concerning their citizens&#039; &#034;<em>tolerance of people unlike themselves and respect for critical thinking/reason</em>.&#034;</p>
<p>The top ten list is more than a little shocking&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20527" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/12/stateranking.jpg" alt="" width="410" height="186" /></p>
<p>Just kidding. That&#039;s a list of states with the highest percentage of citizens who &#034;<a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=504&amp;loc=interstitialskip" target="_blank">say religion is very important in their lives</a>.&#034;</p>
<p>Here&#039;s the complete list&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-20529"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=504&amp;loc=interstitialskip" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20528" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/12/stateranking-religion.jpg" alt="" width="410" height="786" /></a></p>
<p>Before you get mad at me, let me just say that it&#039;s okay for me to make fun of those states. Because they&#039;re all very far away from me.*</p>
<blockquote><p>(via <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/12/31.php" target="_blank">Pharyngula</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span></p>
<p><sup>* To be fair, I&#039;m from New Jersey, which comes in at number 30 with 52 percent, which is below the national average, but not exactly a statistic to brag about.**</sup></p>
<p><sup>** You know how much people love bragging about statistics, right?</sup></p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=20529&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/30/ranking-the-states-by-smart-thinkingness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann Will Never Go Away</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/23/michele-bachmann-will-never-go-away/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/23/michele-bachmann-will-never-go-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Phillips-Sandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teabaggers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=20347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If the teabaggers ever have a prom, snuzzy-wuzzy fuzzball Michele Bachmann would surely be its queen. They love her even more than they hate Socialism! Other people, meanwhile, think Michele Bachmann is certifiably insane and wonder how she got elected to Congress in the first place.
So what do Bachmann&#039;s constituents think about her?
Michele Bachmann may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20349" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/12/michele-bachmann-bill-podium.jpg" alt="michele-bachmann-bill-podium" width="425" height="263" /><br />
If the teabaggers ever have a prom, <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/09/michele-bachmann-is-such-an-adorable-little-fear-mongerer/" target="_self">snuzzy-wuzzy fuzzball</a> Michele Bachmann would surely be its queen. They love her even more than they hate Socialism! Other people, meanwhile, think Michele Bachmann is <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/tag/michele-bachmann/" target="_self">certifiably insane</a> and wonder how she got elected to Congress in the first place.</p>
<p>So what do Bachmann&#039;s constituents <a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2009/12/michele-bachmanns-standing.html" target="_self">think about her</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>Michele Bachmann may be controversial but for now she&#039;s also looking pretty safe for reelection.</p>
<p>Tested against her potential 2010 opponents Bachmann leads Tarryl Clark 55-37 and Maureen Reed 53-37. Bachmann&#039;s leads over them will probably get smaller as they become better known, but she is still over the 50% threshold considered safe for an incumbent. [...]</p>
<p><strong>37% of voters in the district consider Bachmann&#039;s political views to be &#039;extremist.&#039;<br />
</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>We should probably assume they mean that last part as a compliment.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=20347&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/23/michele-bachmann-will-never-go-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is President Obama Getting for Christmas?</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/22/what-is-president-obama-getting-for-christmas/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/22/what-is-president-obama-getting-for-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorldNetDaily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=20330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WorldNetDaily community voted for the perfect gift for the new president&#8230;

Aaaawww&#8230; You shouldn&#039;t have.
(via Think Progress and Andrew Sullivan)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WorldNetDaily community voted for <a href="http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=645&amp;pollShowResults=1" target="_blank">the perfect gift for the new president</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=645&amp;pollShowResults=1" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20329" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/12/worldnetdailypoll.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="440" /></a></p>
<p>Aaaawww&#8230; You shouldn&#039;t have.</p>
<blockquote><p>(via <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/12/21/wnd-christmas-poll/" target="_blank">Think Progress</a> and <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/12/hewitt-award-nominee-1.html" target="_blank">Andrew Sullivan</a>)</p></blockquote>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=20330&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/22/what-is-president-obama-getting-for-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Asks the Burning Question: Should We Maybe Just Kill All the Gays?</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/17/bbc-asks-the-burning-question-should-we-maybe-just-kill-all-the-gays/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/17/bbc-asks-the-burning-question-should-we-maybe-just-kill-all-the-gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uganda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=20165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, BBC put up the most super-thought-provoking poll on its website: Should governments pass laws to murder homosexuals for being homosexuals?


Hmmmmm&#8230; What a complex and difficult question. Let&#039;s see. On the one hand, gay people are human beings who deserve of the same inalienable rights as any other person born on this planet. And state-sanctioned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, BBC put up the most super-thought-provoking poll on its website: <a href="http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2009/12/unbelievable-bbc-asks-readers-should.html" target="_blank"><em>Should governments pass laws to murder homosexuals for being homosexuals?</em></a></p>
<p><em><a href="http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2009/12/unbelievable-bbc-asks-readers-should.html" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20166" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/12/homosexualpoll.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="240" /></a><br />
</em></p>
<p>Hmmmmm&#8230; What a complex and difficult question. Let&#039;s see. On the one hand, gay people are human beings who deserve of the same inalienable rights as any other person born on this planet. <em>And</em> state-sanctioned execution for sexual orientation is barbaric.  And we live in the motherfucking 21st Century.</p>
<p>But on the other, this world is a fucking horrible place.</p>
<p>Tough one!</p>
<p>How about a little help here?</p>
<p><script language="JavaScript" src="http://www.micropoll.com/akira/MicroPoll?id=222669"></script><noscript>
<div><a href="http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/618592-222669">Click Here for Poll</a><a href="http://www.questionpro.com" title="online survey">Online Survey</a><BR> | <a href="http://www.micropoll.com" title="Website Polls">Website Polls</a><BR> | <a href="http://www.contactpro.com" title="email marketing">Email Marketing</a><BR><BR> | <a href="http://www.ideascale.com/crowdsourcing-software.html" title="crowdsourcing software">Crowdsourcing Software</a><BR><a href="http://www.micropoll.com/akira/MicroPoll?mode=html&#038;id=222669">View MicroPoll</A></div>
<p></noscript><!-- END MICROPOLL JAVASCRIPT CODE --></p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=20165&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/17/bbc-asks-the-burning-question-should-we-maybe-just-kill-all-the-gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats More Likely to Believe in Ghosts, Reincarnation, Other Scientifically-Proven Things</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/17/democrats-more-likely-to-believe-in-ghosts-reincarnation-other-scientifically-proven-things/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/17/democrats-more-likely-to-believe-in-ghosts-reincarnation-other-scientifically-proven-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus Christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorldNetDaily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=20155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Brayton &#8212; over at Dispatches from the Culture Wars &#8212; discovered the best ever article from WorldNetDaily, a site that I really need to read more often because it is so smart.
As WND points out, a new poll shows the actually embarrassing fact that&#8230;
Democrats are far more in touch with the dead than Republicans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20157" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/12/ghost.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="229" align="right" />Ed Brayton &#8212; over at <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2009/12/worldnutdaily_dems_talk_to_gho.php#more" target="_blank">Dispatches from the Culture Wars</a> &#8212; discovered the best ever article from WorldNetDaily, a site that I really need to read more often because it is so smart.</p>
<p>As WND points out, a new poll shows <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=119022" target="_blank">the actually embarrassing fact that</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Democrats are far more in touch with the dead than Republicans and they also visit fortune-tellers more often&#8230; The results also show that Democrats are far more likely to believe in supernatural phenomena than Republicans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yikes! That&#039;s not a poll result to be proud of Democrats! What&#039;s funny is that since practically all liberals are born in late-December/early-January, that their innate Capricornian practicality would keep them from believing in deeply-embarrassing stuff like that.</p>
<p>One thing&#039;s for sure: You won&#039;t catch conservatives buying into unprovable, ancient, mystical superstition like that. Isn&#039;t that right, very-next-paragraph-of-WorldNetDaily-article?</p>
<blockquote><p>The Bible has plenty to say about communicating with the dead and dabbling with mediums, psychics, fortune-tellers, witchcraft, astrology and characters such as the devil and his wicked demons. Find out specifics in <a href="http://superstore.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=2453" target="_blank">this autographed, No. 1 best-seller</a> that champions the truth of God!</p></blockquote>
<p>Right! You know, God didn&#039;t send Himself down to Earth to have Himself executed to appease Himself and forgive us for all the sins we weren&#039;t even aware we were committing for nothing!</p>
<p>Come on, Democrats! Stop being so gullible and start worshiping the man who lives in the sky!</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=20155&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/17/democrats-more-likely-to-believe-in-ghosts-reincarnation-other-scientifically-proven-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama Catching Up to George W. Bush Fast</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/09/barack-obama-catching-up-to-george-w-bush-fast/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/09/barack-obama-catching-up-to-george-w-bush-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=19814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hmmmm&#8230; What to make of this?
Perhaps the greatest measure of Obama&#039;s declining support is that just 50% of voters now say they prefer having him as President to George W. Bush, with 44% saying they&#039;d rather have his predecessor.
Seems kind of early in his first term for Obama to nearly achieve the kind of unpopularity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-19819" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/12/bushandobama.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="211" /><br />
Hmmmm&#8230; What <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1209/Bush_closes_the_gap.html" target="_blank">to make of this</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>Perhaps the greatest measure of Obama&#039;s declining support is that just 50% of voters now say they prefer having him as President to George W. Bush, with 44% saying they&#039;d rather have his predecessor.</p></blockquote>
<p>Seems kind of early in his first term for Obama to nearly achieve the kind of unpopularity it too Bush eight years to hit, doesn&#039;t it?</p>
<p>Though, he is a hard worker. You have to give him that.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=19814&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/12/09/barack-obama-catching-up-to-george-w-bush-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>40 Percent of Democrats Are Already Too Lazy to Vote Next Year Eleven Months in Advance</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/30/40-percent-of-democrats-are-already-too-lazy-to-vote-next-year-eleven-months-in-advance/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/30/40-percent-of-democrats-are-already-too-lazy-to-vote-next-year-eleven-months-in-advance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=19459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
According to a new poll from Research 2000, 2 out of 5 of Democratic voters are thinking that they&#039;re probably going to be too busy having their carpets cleaned or something on Election Day next November&#8230;
In the 2010 Congressional elections will you definitely vote, probably vote, not likely vote, or definitely will not vote?
Voter Intensity: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-19460" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/11/donkey.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="197" /><br />
According to a new poll from Research 2000, <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/11/27/808503/-Weekly-Tracking-Poll:-New-Feature-Paints-Ugly-2010-Picture" target="_blank">2 out of 5 of Democratic voters</a> are thinking that they&#039;re probably going to be too busy having their carpets cleaned or something on Election Day next November&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>In the 2010 Congressional elections will you definitely vote, probably vote, not likely vote, or definitely will not vote?</p>
<p><em>Voter Intensity: Definitely + Probably Voting/Not Likely + Not Voting</em></p>
<p><strong>Republican Voters</strong>: 81/14<br />
<strong>Independent Voters</strong>: 65/23<br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Democratic Voters</strong>: 56/40</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, that&#039;s probably a good idea, Democratic voters. Stay home and rest your lever-pulling fingers that day. You&#039;ll need them for typing angry diatribes against Congress in the comments of Daily Kos.</p>
<p>&#039;Cause that&#039;s where Democracy really happens.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=19459&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/30/40-percent-of-democrats-are-already-too-lazy-to-vote-next-year-eleven-months-in-advance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America Inches Ever Closer to Concluding That Global Warming Is B.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/25/america-inches-ever-closer-to-discovering-that-global-warming-is-b-s/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/25/america-inches-ever-closer-to-discovering-that-global-warming-is-b-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=19391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great news! It turns out that man-made global warming is all-of-a-sudden 8 percent less of real thing that we should be concerned about! Yeah! We did it, America!
The percentage of Americans who believe global warming is happening has dipped from 80 to 72 percent in the past year, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-11567" src="http://blog.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/04/earth.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="247" align="right" />Great news! It turns out that man-made global warming is all-of-a-sudden <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/24/AR2009112402989.html?referrer=facebook" target="_blank">8 percent less of real thing that we should be concerned about</a>! Yeah! We did it, America!</p>
<blockquote><p>The percentage of Americans who believe global warming is happening has dipped from 80 to 72 percent in the past year, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, even as a majority still support a national cap on greenhouse gas emissions&#8230;</p>
<p>The <strong>increase in climate skepticism is driven largely by a shift within the GOP</strong>. Since its peak 3 1/2 years ago, belief that climate change is happening is <strong>down sharply among Republicans &#8212; 76 to 54 percent</strong> &#8212; and independents &#8212; 86 to 71 percent. It dipped more modestly among Democrats, from 92 to 86 percent. A majority of respondents still support legislation to cap emissions and trade pollution allowances, by 53 to 42 percent.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow! That&#039;s practically the same <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/19/heres-how-barack-obama-won-the-presidency-or-did-he/" target="_blank">52 percent of Republicans</a> who discovered somehow that evil mastermind community organization ACORN fixed the national election to illegally hand the presidency to Muslim Kenyan spy Barack Obama. What do those people know that the rest of us don&#039;t?</p>
<p>Maybe it&#039;s just that they&#039;re better at interpreting the evidence&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Amanda Feinberg, a retired administrative assistant living in South Williamsport, Pa., said <strong>she became disenchanted with the idea of human-caused global warming when former vice president Al Gore launched a public awareness campaign with his documentary, &#034;An Inconvenient Truth.&#034;</strong></p>
<p>&#034;He just seemed a little radical in his views,&#034; said Feinberg, a Republican. &#034;I don&#039;t deny it&#039;s happening, I just think it&#039;s just an evolution of nature.&#034;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, that rationale certainly checks out. In fact, it&#039;s the exact same way that Nicolaus Copernicus formulated his theory of heliocentric cosmology. To spite some guy he didn&#039;t care for who was being all smug about how the Sun&#039;s always rotating around the Earth and stuff.</p>
<p>Ah, Science!</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=19391&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/25/america-inches-ever-closer-to-discovering-that-global-warming-is-b-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support Grows for Legalizing That Stuff Everybody Has</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/23/support-grows-for-legalizing-that-stuff-everybody-has/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/23/support-grows-for-legalizing-that-stuff-everybody-has/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis DiClaudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=19326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for all the liberal hippies out there, dying for another fix of marijuana to inject into their veins. Public support for legalizing the reefer plant is higher than it&#039;s ever been since before people discovered it was the most dangerous drug in the world&#8230;
&#034;This issue is breaking out in a remarkably rapid way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-19327" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/11/marijuana.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="234" align="right" />Good news for all the liberal hippies out there, dying for another fix of marijuana to inject into their veins. Public support for legalizing the reefer plant is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/22/AR2009112201986.html?hpid=topnews" target="_blank">higher than it&#039;s ever been</a> since before people discovered it was the most dangerous drug in the world&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#034;This issue is breaking out in a remarkably rapid way now,&#034; said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. &#034;Public opinion is changing very, very rapidly.&#034;</p>
<p>The shift is widely described as generational. A Gallup poll in October found 44 percent of Americans favor full legalization of marijuana &#8212; a rise of 13 points since 2000. Gallup said that if public support continues growing at a rate of 1 to 2 percent per year, &#034;the majority of Americans could favor legalization of the drug in as little as four years.&#034;</p></blockquote>
<p>My God! By the end of this century, more than 200 percent of all Americans will support the legalization of marijuana! That means that everybody you know and all the people they know and all the people they don&#039;t know will support it.</p>
<p>I wonder if that&#039;ll be a high-enough percentage to influence congressional Democrats to get behind reform.</p>
<p>Probably not.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=19326&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/23/support-grows-for-legalizing-that-stuff-everybody-has/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama&#039;s Approval Rating Is Less Than 50%, Yet Somehow He&#039;s Still President</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/20/barack-obamas-approval-rating-is-less-than-50-yet-somehow-hes-still-president/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/20/barack-obamas-approval-rating-is-less-than-50-yet-somehow-hes-still-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Phillips-Sandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=19263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When Rep. Brady has finished firing Tim Geithner perhaps he&#039;ll turn his attention to our Commander-in-Chief, whose job approval ratings have slipped below 50% for the first time since he took office.
Conservatives must be salivating over this new Gallup poll&#8230;
Since September, Obama&#039;s approval rating had been holding in the low 50s and, although it has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-19265" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/11/barack-obama-plane-waving.jpg" alt="barack-obama-plane-waving" width="425" height="265" /><br />
When Rep. Brady has finished <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/20/a-dramatic-call-for-tim-geithners-resignation-dramatized/" target="_self">firing Tim Geithner</a> perhaps he&#039;ll turn his attention to our Commander-in-Chief, whose job approval ratings have slipped below 50% for the first time since he took office.</p>
<p>Conservatives must be salivating over <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/122627/Obama-Job-Approval-Down-49.aspx" target="_self">this new Gallup poll</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Since September, Obama&#039;s approval rating had been holding in the low 50s and, although it has reached 50% numerous times, it had never dropped below 50% until now.</p>
<p>Of the post-World War II presidents, Obama now is the fourth fastest to drop below the majority approval level, doing so in his 10th month on the job. Gerald Ford dropped below 50% approval during his third month in office, and Bill Clinton did so in his fourth month. <strong>Ronald Reagan, like Obama, also dropped below 50% in his 10th month in office, though Reagan&#039;s drop occurred a few days sooner in that month (Nov. 13-16, 1981) than did Obama&#039;s (Nov. 17-19, 2009)</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;I mean, they love anything that mentions Ronald Reagan.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=19263&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/20/barack-obamas-approval-rating-is-less-than-50-yet-somehow-hes-still-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#039;s How Barack Obama Won the Presidency (Or Did He?)</title>
		<link>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/19/heres-how-barack-obama-won-the-presidency-or-did-he/?xrs=rss_indecisionforever</link>
		<comments>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/19/heres-how-barack-obama-won-the-presidency-or-did-he/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Phillips-Sandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[XYZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indecisionforever.com/?p=19210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama won the election last year, right? Everyone knows that, right? So this poll that asks if Barack Obama actually won the election last year is about as necessary as a barrel of bacon at a vegan restaurant, right?
Right?
The poll asked this question: &#034;Do you think that Barack Obama legitimately won the Presidential election [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-19212" src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/files/2009/11/squirrel-acorn.jpg" alt="squirrel-acorn" width="175" height="220" align="right" />Barack Obama won the election last year, right? Everyone knows that, right? So this poll that asks if Barack Obama actually won the election last year is about as necessary as a barrel of bacon at a vegan restaurant, right?</p>
<p><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/poll-gop-base-thinks-obama-didnt-actually-win-2008-election----acorn-stole-it.php?ref=fpa" target="_self">Right?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The poll asked this question: &#034;Do you think that Barack Obama legitimately won the Presidential election last year, or do you think that ACORN stole it for him?&#034; The overall top-line is legitimately won 62%, ACORN stole it 26%.</p>
<p>Among Republicans, however, only 27% say Obama actually won the race, with 52% &#8212; an outright majority &#8212; saying that ACORN stole it, and 21% are undecided.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep, 52% of Republicans think ACORN stole the 2008 presidential election, using nothing but their <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/09/11/acorn-busted-in-tax-fraud-prostitution-extreme-stupidity-scandal/" target="_self">patented stupidity</a> to secure 53% of the popular vote for Obama. Another 21% of Republicans think, well, <em>maybe</em>. Yeah. That certainly sounds plausible, but&#8230; hmm, who can say for sure?</p>
<p>After all, if there&#039;s one thing we know about ACORN, it&#039;s that they&#039;re masters of <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/09/16/jon-stewart-slams-acorn/" target="_self">getting away with illegal activity</a> without anybody ever noticing.</p>
<img src="http://www.indecisionforever.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=19210&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indecisionforever.com/2009/11/19/heres-how-barack-obama-won-the-presidency-or-did-he/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
